March 2017 Full Moon Cosmic Weather Forecast: Spiritual Activism and the New American Cold Civil War

Welcome to the March 2017 Full Moon in Virgo, Pisces Solar Festival edition of the Satya Center Cosmic Weather Forecast.

Warm greetings from your Co-Editors, Jane Sherry and Curtis Lang.

Orchid Corner, Satya Center Boca GardenHere in South Florida, in our little suburban garden, Jane and I are surrounded by ripening tomatoes, strawberries and lemons, fast-growing greens and multi-colored flowers spreading from one end of the yard to the other. We are planting veggies for the next growth cycle as we prepare to celebrate the Spring Equinox and the Feast of Archangel Raphael, who presides over the formation and growth of plants and animals!

Watch for our spring equinox newsletter next week when we will share a beautiful spring Archangel Raphael meditation with you!

The tranquility of our little garden stands in stark contrast to the turbulent energy roiling the collective consciousness of humanity during this time of global transition. 

March 2017 Cosmic Weather Forecast

The Full Moon occurs at 10:54 am Eastern time on Sunday March 12, 2017 at  22°13′ Virgo, opposed by Sun at 22°13′ Pisces, along with Mercury and Chiron conjunct the Sun in Pisces.  

For a variety of reasons we shall explore together, this Full Moon weekend is the ideal time to meditate upon the path of spiritual activism and political action as selfless service. Our guides say that:

Soon, the time is coming when we will be given a choice to actively resist the forces of Mammon and the other dark angels who would enslave humanity in gross egoism by feeding our darkest impulses and convincing us that we are merely predatory animals whose lives unfold according to a clockwork mechanism concealed in our genetic code. 

Soon we will see a liberation spirituality for the 21st century arise among people around the world. This is a crucial part of the necessary transition from the Age of Pisces to the New Age of Aquarius.

Spiritual people everywhere will soon receive the call to participate in a movement to restore right human relations around the world. Together we can heal the wounded environment, end the rule of Mammon in our political and economic life, and initiate a new social contract based upon acknowledgement of humanity's highest aspirations, enlightened impulses and clear spiritual guidance. 

Meditate upon this and ask for inspiration this Full Moon weekend!

The opposition between the Virgo Moon and Pisces Sun highlights the need to choose between selfless service and the suffering that defines ego-consciousness. 

The Virgo-Pisces axis has a reputation for suffering of all kinds. Virgo is the sign symbolized by the Virgin, who at her best is a self-sufficient warrior and at her worst is a self-absorbed egotist. Pisces is symbolized by the twin fishes, and at its best Pisces energy is self-sacrificing, spiritually awakened and connected to the Universal web of life, but at its worst Pisces can be unconscious, undirected and lost in a sea of possibilities, unable to choose or act.

Astrologer Jeffrey Wolf Green, who wrote many landmark books on Evolutionary and Soul Astrology, called the Virgo-Pisces axis the sado-masochistic axis because it is found in the charts of many individuals who mix sex with suffering.

This Full Moon we can choose to balance our Virgo tendencies toward egotistic individualism with a strong dose of Piscean selfless service.

The more we can tune in to the elevated Virgo energies the more we can act as spiritual warriors, defending spiritual values in the world, and rising to our highest spiritual aspirations in our own lives.

The more we can tune in to the elevated Pisces energies the more we can demonstrate the power of trans-personal consciousness to lead us as individuals and groups to healing.

This week, when we perform selfless service, helping others in need, we will attract what we require for self-healing.  When we act as spiritual activists, working to improve conditions in the world for the poor and exploited, we will attract an amplified energy stream from Source that can strengthen us physically, emotionally and mentally.

Jupiter in Libra opposes Uranus in Aries, and both Jupiter and Uranus are square Pluto in Capricorn, creating a major outer planet T-Square in Cardinal signs. This creates an intensified focus on the unfinished business of civilization wide transformation signaled by the Grand Cardinal Cross and Uranus-Pluto squares that have dominated Cosmic Weather patterns for the last ten years.

Sensitized by the Pisces Sun, we become increasingly aware of long-standing personal and collective problems that simply demand solutions now, and we are also painfully aware that solutions will require much deeper thought and reflection than we had expected and much longer time-frames to implement.

These aspects create a kind of inner tension that demands release. In our personal lives we can experience heightened frustration with intractable problems and in our collective life we may experience dramatic conflicts between partners, family members, groups and nations.

Fortunately Moon in Virgo trine Pluto in Capricorn will enable us to tune into subtle energies around us, making us more perceptive about the nature of our most difficult problems and more receptive to the impulse for positive change in our lives.

This Full Moon, above all we will need patience, a willingness to do the hard work of analyzing thorny dilemmas and the understanding that major problems require well-thought-out well-crafted long-term solutions. 

For all these reasons, in our personal lives and on the world stage the keynote of the month is increased tension.

For the collective consciousness, the tension is triggered by our frustrated attempts to make sense of the slow-motion crumbling and dissolution of our political and economic systems and the decay of social norms and morals.

All attempts by our leaders to maintain the status quo require increasing expenditures of energy and the search for new solutions to our ongoing problems demands ever-increasing effort as new, workable solutions have yet to be found, much less implemented.

American Empire 1898For Americans, a palpable sense of decline hangs like smog over all that we see and do. This mood has existed for the last decade, despite all attempts to ignore or deny the unpleasant reality.

"Available economic, educational, and military data indicate that, when it comes to U.S. global power, negative trends will aggregate rapidly by 2020 and are likely to reach a critical mass no later than 2030," explains Professor Alfred McCoy, in a 2010 article.  "The American Century, proclaimed so triumphantly at the start of World War II, will be tattered and fading by 2025, its eighth decade, and could be history by 2030."

"Significantly, in 2008, the U.S. National Intelligence Council admitted for the first time that America’s global power was indeed on a declining trajectory. In one of its periodic futuristic reports, Global Trends 2025, the Council cited 'the transfer of global wealth and economic power now under way, roughly from West to East' and 'without precedent in modern history,' as the primary factor in the decline of the 'United States’ relative strength — even in the military realm.'”

"Viewed historically, the question is not whether the United States will lose its unchallenged global power, but just how precipitous and wrenching the decline will be," says McCoy. 

Empires come and go. Europe's empires have disappeared. Great Britain no longer rules the waves, but England did a great job of managing its Imperial decline, passing the burden of Empire on to Anglo-Saxon cousins in America while retaining an outsize role on the world stage.

So far, there is no indication that American elites recognize the need to manage America's Imperial decline. In fact, as we recall from the 2016 election, both Republican and Democratic establishments declared that Donald Trump was crazy for thinking he needed to make America great again. As we shall see in this newsletter, Trump's proposals to return the US to its former glory will only accelerate income inequality, reward the rich, punish women, immigrants, African-Americans, Latinos, Muslims and the poor and middle classes, and set America on a collision course with environmental catastrophe. 

No wonder the collective consciousness in the US is sour with anger, anxiety, fear and frustration. 

When people are faced with what appear to be insoluble problems and are faced with lose-lose choices or choices that seem irrelevant or unworkable, there is a tendency to seek escape in alcohol, drugs, fantasy, rumors and alternative realities fabricated by unscrupulous authority figures. Maybe it's not a coincidence that Neptune is in Pisces, creating astral glamours, mental fog and a generalized desire to escape from reality.

"The intensifying hysteria over Russia has pushed Official Washington over the edge into outright madness," explains investigative journalist Robert Parry, one of the intrepid reporters who broke the Iran-Contra scandal in the Eighties, in a recent Consortium News article. "On one side of this asylum, you have the Democrats, neoconservatives and mainstream media, while on the other, you have the embattled Trump administration. Both sides have been making grave allegations with little or no evidence to support them."

"The Democratic/neocon/MainStreamMedia side has pushed the conspiracy theory that Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russians to put the real-estate mogul in the White House, but there is, as yet, no evidence that such a thing happened," Parry argues.

"Even one of the top advocates feeding this Russia frenzy, New York Times correspondent Thomas L. Friedman, acknowledged on Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that 'I agree, there is no evidence,' but then added: 'which is why we need a special prosecutor or an independent commission to get to the bottom of it.'”

"But that is not how investigations are supposed to work," Parry continues. "You’re supposed to have evidence of wrongdoing and then examine it in the investigative phase to see if the evidence withstands scrutiny. What Friedman is suggesting is more like a 'fishing expedition' or a 'witch hunt.'”

"The drip-drip of this investigative water torture finally got to President Trump last week as he flew down to his winter home at Mar-a-Lago. He joined the crazy melee early Saturday morning by sending out a flurry of tweets accusing President Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower in New York City in the weeks before the Nov. 8 election. Trump also offered no evidence while demanding an investigation to get to the bottom of this.
By contrast, in all the major investigations that I have handled as an investigative reporter, such as Oliver North’s secret White House paramilitary operation; the related Nicaraguan Contra drug trafficking scandal; Richard Nixon interference with President Lyndon Johnson’s Vietnam peace talks in 1968; and Ronald Reagan’s campaign sabotage of President Jimmy Carter’s Iranian-hostage negotiations in 1980 – there was substantial evidence from eyewitnesses and documents supporting the suspicions before the story was published.
At no point would I have argued that just because Oliver North met a Contra leader that it was time to investigate whether he and his Reagan administration superiors were breaking the law. I first found multiple insiders, including people in the U.S. government and the Contra movement, describing how North was running his back-channel war. In some of these investigative situations, we had two dozen or so sources describing detailed aspects of these operations before we made any allegations in print."

"Now the argument is that because some people suspect something, even without evidence, major investigations are warranted. That is usually what a conspiracy theory sounds like. Someone claims not to understand how something could have happened a certain way and thus a full-scale inquiry is needed into some highly unlikely and speculative scenario."

As conspiracy theories proliferate along the entire political spectrum, truth in America is becoming more and more a matter of personal choice because there is so little common ground among people and so little trust in the authority figures who had defined that common ground for us.

The resulting cognitive dissonance affects us all and creates a societal tendency towards anger, scapegoating and large-scale conflict.

So we find ourselves in 2017 trying to deal with a breakdown in civil society.  Since the Global Financial Meltdown there's been a constant, slow erosion of living standards for a majority of Americans, and as the erosion has increased, so has social disorder and political conflict.

Reagan and ThatcherThe seeds of this economic decline and social breakdown were sown nearly 40 years ago, when Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan established the neoliberal economic and political regime that increasingly defines our global community's social relations.

Reagan and Thatcher launched a philosophical and political revolution that changed the world. They changed the way we view ourselves as human beings, how we view society, and how we define the proper role of government in our lives.

The individual was elevated above community.

Each individual was viewed as a combatant in a war of all against all. That combat was to take place in an economic marketplace that would automatically value everyone and everything in dollars and cents.

Humans were viewed as completely rational beings whose every action was designed to maximize their economic gain at the expense of everyone and everything around them. 

The most worthy individuals would accumulate the most wealth. A crude social Darwinism would empower wealthy people and disempower everyone else, and that would automatically create the best of all possible worlds.

This form of rational materialism went hand-in-hand with biological determinism. Nature was thought to evolve through the survival of the fittest, and those with the best genes would automatically be the most successful at accumulating wealth in the free marketplace. There would be no limits to the freedom granted in the pursuit of wealth because any such limits would impede the ability of the evolutionary process to reward those with the best genes, those who were the fittest, because they were the wealthiest.

Thus the marketplace would create a totally merit-based market society in which everyone would automatically find their own proper place. Any efforts by governments, religious institutions, or political movements to alter the status of rich or poor would impede the inexorable forward march of human progress, and were literally considered counter-evolutionary. 

A model of the rational materialist individual profit-seeking human being as predatory animal became the philosophical basis for a hyper-capitalist Utopia.

Thatcher contended that ". . .there's no such thing as society. There are individual men and women and there are families. And no government can do anything except through people, and people must look after themselves first. It is our duty to look after ourselves and then, also, to look after our neighbours." 

Neoliberalism is a philosophy that puts the liberty of the individual to amass wealth ahead of all other societal norms and considerations.

Because the role of the state involves taxing wealth and redistributing it to provide needed security, infrastructure and social services, the state is the enemy of the wealthy, who happen to be the most worthy members of society in this worldview.

Civil society and government alike put moral and legal constraints on the ability of wealth holders to harm the environment and harm others in the sacred pursuit of riches. 

Therefore the duty of the wealthy was to wage war on government and civil society. All in the name of freedom.

Freedom for the powerful and wealthy is the most important social good in this philosophy. Anything that impinges on the freedom to accumulate wealth is by definition immoral.

In such a society, rule by the wealthiest is seen as an evolutionary imperative. Resources must be directed to those who will use them most efficiently. Those worthy few of course would be the most wealthy.  Their actions to create more wealth and power for themselves would automatically create so much more wealth that it would trickle down to the middle class and the poor through some poorly understood economic hocus-pocus. This is the origin of trickle-down economics.

For such people the final goal of human society will be achieved when there are only masters and slaves.

This is a philosophy suited to the emergence of a war of all against all.

And over the last 40 years wealth has become so concentrated that we now routinely speak of the 1% vs. the 99% of humanity. 

That is no accident.

Nor is it an accident that an environmental crisis has erupted during the same period of time.

Neoliberalism appeared at the time when scientists began to sound the alarm about looming environmental catastrophe, which environmentalists warned would be brought about by unregulated corporate greed. If you believed the scientists you would have to restrain the markets, and regulate corporate polluters. You would have to put the good of the community above the freedom of the shareholders to seek profit above all else.

That would be immoral according to neoliberalism.

When it is forbidden for the state to intervene to protect the environmental commons then there is no chance that human society will block wealthy predators from hastening global environmental catastrophe.

When it is forbidden for the state to redistribute wealth from the most powerful to the most in need then programs like food stamps, Social Security, Medicaid, and unemployment insurance are immoral and those who receive any government benefits are mere parasites. 

Of course neoliberalism is an extremely radical view of human nature, human society, and human consciousness, and this worldview could only be imposed on the global population by political repression, financial manipulation and unprecedented propaganda campaigns worldwide.

There were certainly huge conflicts during the Eighties and Nineties between the neoliberals and more traditional, primarily left-wing political parties all over the world.

However the globalized neoliberal economic system has gained unquestioned dominance since that time.

All over the world, the consensus consciousness has accepted the philosophical assumptions of the Reagan-Thatcher neoliberal social order.

Socialists and traditional big government liberals in America, Europe and other countries have abandoned their initial opposition to the global neoliberal economic system and now see it as inevitable and unalterable.

Their acceptance of the status quo, which is destabilizing our human habitat, consigning the vast majority of human beings to the category of redundant and unnecessary social baggage, and concentrating wealth in fewer and fewer hands worldwide, has utterly discredited these traditional enemies of uber-predatory capitalism.

Broken Piggy BankNeoliberal predatory capitalism glorified the banker above all. High taxes would be replaced by government debt. Loans from bankers were to replace the taxes used by governments to pay for social programs, environmental protection and needed infrastructure.

Privatization of public assets like utilities, mass-transit systems and national oil companies would provide for more efficient management of these resources because the wealthy would do anything and everything required to extract profits from these assets. If that resulted in catastrophically increased costs to citizens, an impoverishment of the state, and tremendous social pain, that was a small price to pay for such economic efficiency.

Neoliberal governments deregulated banking and finance, allowing the reappearance of ancient social ills, such as usury. Fair, living wages, supported historically by vast union movements, were suppressed, as were the unions that fought for them.

Globalization put workers in industrialized nations into a highly financialized competitive marketplace with several billion others, most of whom would work for starvation wages. Bankers would supply easy access to credit, at usurious prices, to the downwardly mobile workers and eventually a society of debt slaves and billionaire bankers and investors would replace the old social order. 

The Reagan-Thatcher regime culminated in the 2008 Global Financial Meltdown which created a systemic crisis in the neoliberal global financial system that threatens its very existence.

Since the advent of the Grand Cardinal Cross aspects that coincided with the Global Financial Meltdown of 2008 and continue through this decade, the pressure on the neoliberal status quo has increased in tandem with the disruptive influences of accelerating climate change worldwide.

In Europe the disruption from the Global Financial Meltdown was much greater than in America, and the political push-back from the 99% has been much stronger.

The leftist, Socialist parties in Europe chose to attempt to retain the basic global financial infrastructure of neoliberalism and sought to merely provide palliatives for the unbearable social pain. They joined the neoliberals and became pillars of the status quo.

Right wing parties in Europe were totally excluded from the neoliberal consensus during the last forty years. This is why today in European countries other than Spain, Italy and Greece, right-wing political parties are seen as the only authentic opponents of the neoliberal consensus reality, and they have grown massively as a result.

In America, the Democratic party was the traditional enemy of Reagan and Thatcher, but the Democratic Party made a deal with the neoliberals once they had attained the commanding heights of power. Bill Clinton campaigned on explicit promises to undo the neoliberal economic policies of Reagan and Bush, but only a few months after his election he turned over control of the economy to Wall Street insiders and bemoaned the fact that he was being forced to govern like a "Rockefeller Republican."

Later Clinton abolished the early Twentieth Century bank regulations that had prevented Wall Street from blowing up the economy as they had done in the Nineteen Twenties. This was a neoliberal wet dream come to life. The predictable result was the Global Financial Meltdown. 

So it is understandable that during the 2016 election Hillary Clinton, who self-identified as a champion of the status quo neoliberal consensus reality, had no credibility as an agent of change.

Americans demanded change, and they got it.

Donald Trump, echoing the rhetoric of European right-wing nationalist parties on immigration and aggressive nationalism, was elected President. Trump overcame Hillary and Jeb Bush, the two politicians in America most invested in the neoliberal consensus reality.

Now Trump, a Republican, is at war with two neoliberal political machines -- the Clinton wing of the Democratic party and the Bush wing of the Republican party. And Trump is also at war with the Bernie Sanders quasi-socialist reform wing of the Democratic party as well.

In the wake of the 2016 election, America's two political parties are divided in a way never seen before in my lifetime.

Democrats and Republicans inhabit two different worlds, with different news sources, different "facts", different world views, and different cultures that clash at every level of reality.

Not only that, both parties also suffer from deep divisions that threaten to undermine them completely.

Traditional Republican Conservatives hate Trump because Trump believes that debt is good and has no patience for their arcane economic theories. Republican Neoliberals hate Trump because he is their enemy and wants to destroy them. 

Yet all three flavors of Republicans must try to work together if they are to govern successfully. That is unlikely to work out in the long term.

The split in the Democratic party is between the Obama-Clinton neoliberals and the quasi-socialists of the Bernie Sanders wing. The Sanders wing favors financial reform, expanded social safety nets, an expanded union movement, and other positions associated with the pre-Clinton Democratic party. This battle is certain to grow more heated over time, as 2018 elections loom.

There is remarkably little common ground between the neoliberals in the two parties, because American politics has become so personal and so bitter over the last decade.

The fundamental issue dividing the two groups of neoliberals is what may be called "identity politics". Republicans self-identify as the party of the white upper classes and white working people. Democrats of course would create a rainbow coalition to win elections.

The Republican neoliberals continue to maintain their traditional racism, which they associate with the multi-decade success of the infamous Nixonian and Reaganite "Southern Strategy". Nixon attacked Lyndon Johnson's civil rights legislation and Republicans used their anti-civil rights agenda to drive Southern Democrats into the Republican party. Before Nixon, the South was dependably Democratic, but since Nixon and Reagan the South is a Republican fortress.

The Democratic neoliberals truly seem to believe that a society based on neoliberal winner-take-all Social Darwinism is actually a meritocracy in which those who amass the most wealth are by definition the most creative, intelligent, pragmatic and capable members of society. In their view, rule by the 1% -- celebrities, trust fund babies, tech industry robber barons, and Wall Street banksters -- is fine as long as the 1% is ethnically, racially and sexually diverse. 

These two groups of neoliberals will continue their war while simultaneously waging war against the Trump and Sanders factions.

The Trump and Sanders factions are also divided by identity politics.

The Trump faction loathe socialists, left wingers, feminists, civil rights activists and liberals, who they associate with Sixties Social movements.

The Sanders faction represents the synthesis of old-school pre-Clinton Democratic party economic reformism with the identity politics that helped liberate African-Americans, Latinos, women, pot smokers, and the LGBT community.

Trump loyalists and Sanders supporters are the most likely to end up fighting in the streets because they are so fundamentally opposed on virtually every important issue of our day.

So we have a four-way or five-way brawl developing in American politics which threatens to tear the two parties apart, and which will undoubtedly end in complete transformation for Republicans and Democrats alike. This transformation is set to occur over the next two or three Presidential election cycles. 

The most likely scenario is a Constitutional Crisis which results in a Constitutional Convention and the drafting of a completely new American social contract.

It is unlikely that the American political system in its present form will successfully address today's pressing social issues. None of the factions has credible plans to deal with income inequality, a fragile financial system, a dysfunctional health care system, a looming pension crisis, impending environmental catastrophe, and the onset of a war between opposing classes, races, religions, and cultures? 

American FascistTrump wants tax cuts for the rich, anti-immigration legislation, the end of reproductive rights for women, a more punitive, further deregulated health care system, more deregulation of finance, a wall along the Mexican border and a military build-up that will cost untold billions of dollars.  

Trump claims he will achieve victory in the Global War on Terror but Trump has articulated no new strategy to achieve that victory and no new tactics are yet on offer.  

How likely is it that neoliberal Republicans, Cruz Conservatives or members of the Democratic party will provide enough support for Donald Trump so that he can implement his vast wish list of fundamental changes to American society?

After all, he wants to remove them all from power.

Why would they slit their own throats? 

Well, because Trump's agenda in many ways is a more extreme form of Reagan-Thatcher neoliberalism laced with ultra-nationalist anti-immigrant rhetoric and a war on women.

Once you strip away the rhetoric, Trump's proposals simply take existing neoliberal policies to their ultimate conclusions.

Reagan and Thatcher wanted a health care system that relies on private sector leadership. America has that now, but Trump proposes to put the system on free market s

Dalai lamaDonald trumpFull moon astrology march 2017Full moon cosmic weather forecastGlobal financial crisisGrand cardinal crossJesus christLiberation theologyNeoliberalismPope francisPope john paul xxiiiSpiritual activism